Below Are Some Examples of Results We Have Achieved for Our Clients

  • Publix Employees Federal Credit Union v. Consumer, No. 2016-CC-001681 (Fla. Polk County Ct.). Judgment Amount $14,187.37. Garnishment Dismissed April 16, 2020
  • PMI Mortgage v. Consumer, No. 2019-CA-1120 (Fla. Pasco Cir. Ct.). Judgment Amount $23,485.24. Wage Garnishment Dissolved February 28, 2020
  • Midland Funding LLC v. Consumer, No. 18-CC-014377 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.).Judgment Amount $7,128.81. Wage Garnishment Dissolved: April 2, 2019
  • Capital One Bank v. Consumer, No. 11-CA-4172 (Fla. Sarasota Circ. Ct.). Judgment Amount $35,131.90. Wage Garnishment Dismissed February 14, 2019
  • Grow Financial Federal Credit Union v. Consumer, No. 16-CC-009586 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $9,278.77. Wage Garnishment Dismissed: December 6, 2018
  • Palisades Collection LLC v. Consumer, No. CONO06004374 (Fla. Broward County Ct.). Judgment Amount $5,610.69. Wage Garnishment Dismissed November 6, 2018
  • Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. v. Consumer, No. 10-CC-014017 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $3,932.01. Wage Garnishment Case Settled July 17, 2018
  • CSGA, LLC A/S/O First USA Bank v. Consumer, No. 07-002538-CO (Fla. Pinellas County Ct.). Judgment Amount $12,605.08. Wage Garnishment Dissolved July 16, 2018
  • Chase Bank USA N.A v. Consumer, No. 08-CC-24190 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $8,810.62. Wage Garnishment Amount Reduced March 15, 2018
  • Discover Bank v. Consumer, No. 16-CC-022438 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $7,930.85. Wage Garnishment Dissolved July 17, 2017
  • Suncoast Credit Union v. Consumer, No. 16-CC-030687 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $16,744.63. Wage Garnishment Dismissed June 5, 2017
  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Consumer, No. 2015CA-004157 (Fla. Polk Circ. Ct.). Judgment Amount $20,316.43. Wage Garnishment Dismissed May 3, 2017
  • NCO Portfolio Management v. Consumer, No. 06-CC-3343 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $3,475.71. Wage Garnishment Dismissed April 17, 2017
  • Erin Capital Management LLC v. Consumer, No. 08-CC-036976 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $2,376.39. Wage Garnishment Dismissed February 8, 2017
  • Atlantic Credit and Finance Inc v. Consumer, No. 51-08-CC-002246 (Fla. Pasco County Ct.). Judgment Amount $11,654.14. Wage Garnishment Satisfied January 28, 2017
  • Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Consumer, No. 11-CC-006785 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $2,476.88. Wage Garnishment Dismissed October 17, 2016
  • Asset Acceptance LLC v. Consumer, No. 11-CC-030849 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $8,684.81. Wage Garnishment Dissolved October 4, 2016
  • Teri Loan Holdings v. Consumer, No. 12-CC-005483-SC (Fla. Sarasota County Ct.). Judgment Amount $12,743.00. Wage Garnishment Dissolved August 5, 2016
  • The Independent Savings Plan Company v. Consumer, No. 10-CC-021353 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $9,753.39. Wage Garnishment Case Settled May 23, 2016
  • Asset Acceptance LLC v. Consumer, No. 05-CC-1224-ES-D (Fla. Pasco County Ct.). Judgment Amount $13,108.36. Wage Garnishment Dissolved March 7, 2016
  • Suncoast Schools Federal Credit Union v. Consumer, No. 10-CC-02758 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $82,227.16. Wage Garnishment Dismissed February 5, 2016
  • MacDill Federal Credit Union v. Consumer, No. 06-CC-003765 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $11,188.46. Wage Garnishment Dismissed October 16, 2015
  • Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Consumer, No. 13-CC-003564 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $8321.38. Wage Garnishment Dismissed August 5, 2015
  • Capital One v. Consumer, No. 51-05-SC-1000-ES (Fla. Pasco County Ct.). Judgment Amount $2,372.61. Wage Garnishment Satisfied May 11, 2015
  • Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Consumer, No. 11-CC-036900 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $3,920.34. Wage Garnishment Dissolved April 14, 2015
  • Grow Financial Federal Credit Union v. Consumer, No. 11-CC-02961 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $6,954.81. Wage Garnishment Dismissed March 25, 2015
  • MacDill Federal Credit Union v. Consumer, No. 05-CC-26806 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.).  Judgment Amount $14,804.71. Wage Garnishment Amount Reduced February 27, 2015
  • LVNV Funding LLL v. Consumer, No. 07-CC-22069 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $3,723.03. Wage Garnishment Dismissed July 18, 2014
  • Cach LLC v. Consumer, No.13-CC-016615 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $5,939.78. Wage Garnishment Dissolved May 19, 2014
  • Financial Independence Srvcs. Corp. v. Consumer, No. 16-2008-SC-7202 (Fla. Duval County Ct.). Judgment Amount $2,201.66. Wage Garnishment Amount Reduced April 29, 2014
  • SunTrust Bank v. Consumer, No. 09-CA-004987 (Fla. Hills. Circ. Ct.). Judgment Amount $ 53,726.08. Wage Garnishment Dissolved March 26, 2014
  • Independent Savings Plan Company v. Consumer, No. 12-CC-009538 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $8,050.91. Wage Garnishment Dismissed October 23, 2013
  • Cach LLC v. Consumer, No. 07-CC-39529 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $10,387.09. Wage Garnishment Dissolved September 16, 2013
  • Cach LLC v. Consumer, No. 08-SC-003884 (Fla. Pasco County Ct.). Judgment Amount $4,814.20. Wage Garnishment Refunded September 9, 2013
  • Capital One Bank v. Consumer, No. 07-10065-SC (Fla. Pinellas County Ct.). Judgment Amount $2,683.65. Wage Garnishment Dissolved May 10, 2013
  • Midland Funding, LLC v. Consumer, No. 08-11229-CO (Fla. Pinellas County Ct.). Judgment Amount $13,090.52. Wage Garnishment Amount Reduced January 12, 2011
  • Capital One Bank (USA), NA v. Consumer, No. 08-CC-015472 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $7,546.23. Wage Garnishment Dismissed September 10, 2010
  • Unifund CCR Partners v. Consumer, No.08-CC-032509 (Fla. Hills. County Ct.). Judgment Amount $1,485.37. Wage Garnishment Refunded August 26, 2010
  • Palisades Collection LLC v. Consumer, No. 06-9946-CO (Fla. Pinellas County Ct.). Judgment Amount $6,038.24. Wage Garnishment Dismissed October 15, 2008

Free Case Evaluation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.